|
Hardship and Poverty in the
Pacific
A SUMMARY
Until
recently, poverty has not been considered a serious issue in the
Pacific as images of hunger and destitution frequently seen in
other parts of the developing world have been largely absent.
In the last
decade, however, the relatively poor economic performance of
most of the countries, the political instability and ethnic
tensions that have surfaced in some, increasing levels of youth
unemployment, and emerging social problems have raised questions
about the true extent of poverty and hardship in the Pacific.
In order to bring
these issues into sharper focus and to raise awareness of them,
the Asian Development Bank (ADB) sponsored country poverty
assessments that quantified key poverty indicators in nine
countries and conducted participatory assessments of hardship in
more than 150 village and urban communities in eight.1 At the
same time, ADB conducted a parallel exercise to assess Pacific
development strategies and policies and their impact on poverty
and hardship.
Read the whole document (PDF 5,44 Mo)
Useful links:
-
The
Priorities of the People
-
The
National Strategies and a Framework for the
Future
The perceptions
of the people are important indicators of the extent of hardship
and poverty in society. The needs, aspirations, and priorities
of the poor can provide valuable guidance to answering key
policy questions and can help set national development
priorities and strategies. Frequently, however, the views of the
people either are not sought or are overlooked by policy
makers.2 The
participatory assessments of hardship sought the perceptions of
the people, particularly the poor and most disadvantaged, on
what poverty and hardship meant for them in their
daily lives
including details of extent and nature, primary causes, and
priorities for alleviation.
Poverty and
hardship in the Pacific are defined as inadequate levels of
sustainable human development due to a lack and to income
earning opportunities (see Box 1). This basic definition,
strengthened by
reference to the importance of family, kinship, and customary
obligations, was widely debated and agreed to during
consultations in all countries included in the hardship
assessments.
The assessments
revealed that few communities acknowledged that extreme poverty
was an issue. Only in Fiji Islands and Papua New Guinea (PNG)
was this type of poverty accepted as a serious concern.
However, all
communities without exception acknowledged that hardship was a
common, widely shared condition when defined as a family’s
inability to supply basic needs and to meet community
obligations. In
general this meant that such a family had no regular wage earner
or source of income from remittances.
In urban areas,
however, there was hardship even among families with an employed
member, the so-called working poor whose wage income did not
bring them above the basic-needs poverty line.
Theirs was a life
of making difficult choices between competing priorities:
Hardship was seen
also as the result of poor education, the lack of access to land
for food gardens or cash crops, poor access to good water and
sanitation facilities, poor health, and living alone or
depending on others. In short, the communities surveyed
recognized that there are growing numbers of disadvantaged
people who are being left behind as national economies expand
and become more monetized and as traditional ties weaken.
These concerns
were remarkably consistent not only between the urban and rural
areas within each country but also across the region. In other
words, despite the wide differences in geography and resource
endowments among the atoll states of Micronesia and the high
islands of Melanesia and most of Polynesia, the concerns of the
people are very similar. The causes of hardship and poverty
center around the need for income, the need for a reasonable
standard of basic services, and the need for skills to meet
opportunities and challenges as they become available.
For
further information, please contact:
David
has more than 25 years of experience working in the region
and has been responsible for the preparation of eight of
the country poverty assessments.
|