Gamefishing in the Pacific and Data Collection
Funding provided by Aus AID in 1998 has allowed dedicated work on billfish to be undertaken for the first time.
Presently there is very little available gamefish data. What is available is very fragmented, incomplete and inaccessible. As such there is a pressing need to co-ordinate and collate existing data and to ensure the collection of future data. Several forms have been produced for helping in the collection of fishing data. They concern tournament data, troll data, tagging instruction and a key to marlin species identification.
[Forms /
Formularies...]
[SCTB Working Paper on Present
knowledge –current and future research (2000)...]
Observers’ work
Fishery
observer information is a valuable tool. It is the only truly independent source
of catch and bycatch statistics at the species level, while also providing
vessel and fishing effort information. For this reason the Statistics and
Monitoring Section of the Oceanic Fisheries Programme provides technical support
and direction to the national observer programmes of SPC member countries.
Currently there are active observer programmes in the Cook Islands, Federated
States of Micronesia, Fiji, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Papua New Guinea and
Solomon Islands. These countries are soon to be joined by French Polynesia and
New Caledonia who have recently secured PROC FISH (EU) funds.
The OFP has
supported observer programmes since the early 1990’s by providing scientific
input into observer training courses run by the Forum Fisheries Agency (FFA).
Since that time OFP has worked closely with FFA in the development and support
of observer programmes throughout the region. The type of data collected by the
fishery observers is directed by the Data Collection Committee (DCC), which is
made up of staff from OFP, FFA and other invited guests. A meeting takes place
every second year. The DCC reviews the information collected on all South
Pacific Regional Standard forms including logsheets, unloading forms, observer
and port sampling forms, and supports their use in all SPC and FFA member
countries. The latest report, which includes the forms, is available here -
[DCC
report and regional forms...]
Global
Environment Facility (GEF) funds presently employs one staff member of the OFP,
the Fishery Monitoring Supervisor, to provide support to the observer and port
sampling programmes, but it is hoped an additional two positions will be funded
through the PROC FISH programme in the very near future. In addition to this,
GEF has provided funds for two Observer Co-ordinators (Assistants) at the
national level for Papua New Guinea and Kiribati. "Fork Length", an
occasional observer and port sampler newsletter, is produced in an effort to
integrate the observer programmes from around the region and to disseminate
additional information to the observers. [Fork
length...] Other resource materials are currently in production and will soon
be available on this website.
The Western and Central
Pacific Fishery Convention allows for the development of a regional observer
programme at some point in the future. Any regional observer programme would
require a large contingent of trained observers and work is already underway to
increase the number of observers in the region. This work, along with the
production of sound resource material will support the work of the national
observer programmes and allow them to work in an independent manner, while also
preparing member countries for the proposed regional observer programme.
Length and species
composition data for stock assessment are also collected through port sampling
programmes. There are currently 26 harbours throughout the region where port
sampling data are collected, supported by either direct funding or technical
advise from OFP.
Contact: observer@spc.int
or portsampler@spc.int
By-catch and Discard in Western Tuna Fisheries
The
western and central Pacific Ocean currently supports the largest
industrial tuna fishery in the world, with an estimated catch in 1992 of
1,089,607 mt in the SPC statistical area alone (Lawson 1993). Skipjack is
the most important of the four major tuna species in the fishery,
accounting for 67 per cent of the catch by weight in 1992, followed by
yellowfin (24.5%), bigeye (5%) and albacore (3%). Purse seine gear was
responsible for 80 per cent of the total catch, with pole-and-line gear
accounting for 7 per cent, longline gear 12 per cent and troll gear 1 per
cent.
All
of these fisheries invariably have some level of catch of non-target
species (termed ‘by-catch’). A portion of this by-catch is discarded
because it has little or no economic value, and, if retained, would take
up storage capacity best used for the more valuable tuna species. A
portion of the target catch is also often discarded for economic reasons,
or because it is damaged, physically too small for efficient processing,
or lost because of gear failures during fishing operations.
[By-catch
publications...]
Billfish and bycatch growth studies
While we remain largely ignorant
about the impacts of tuna fisheries on by-catch species and pelagic ecosystems,
it is obvious that these impacts have increased very significantly over the last
50 years as tuna fisheries worldwide have expanded their catches and effort by
orders of magnitude. However, we have little or no information on the relative
abundances or biomasses of many components of the pelagic ecosystem.
Observer programs, conducted by
regional and national organizations, have developed over the last two to three
decades. In general, these observer programs were created to monitor activities
such as compliance with licensing agreements and restrictions on incidental
catches. In addition to providing information required for meeting those
objectives, observer programs provide essentially the only reliable, detailed
information on catches discarded at sea. Based on such observer programs in the
WCPO the main by-catch species of tuna fisheries are billfish, sharks, Escolar,
Wahoo, Mahi-mahi, Rainbow runner, and Opah.
[Growth
Studies...]
|