Forests Could Accelerate Global Warming

From: Jayne Musumba (jayne@sidsnet.org)
Date: Fri Nov 10 2000 - 12:29:49 EST

  • Next message: anstewar@fes.uwaterloo.ca: "Rising Seas Imperil Pacific Island Nations"

    Forests Could Accelerate Global Warming

    LONDON, United Kingdom, November 9, 2000 (ENS) - Two reports
    released yesterday warn against relying on carbon "sinks" to ward
    off climate change.

    Relying on forest plantations to store carbon pollution from the
    atmosphere and combat climate change could accelerate the
    destruction of old growth native forest around the world,
    according to a report commissioned by Greenpeace and Worldwide
    Fund for Nature.

    In a separate report, the United Kingdom's Hadley Centre for
    Climate Prediction and Research says that climate change will
    accelerate because carbon dioxide will be released from soils and
    decaying forests as the climate warms.

    It warns further against relying on sinks - forests that are
    planted as a means of combatting climate change by soaking up
    greenhouse gases in the atmosphere - because they also absorb
    more sunlight which would contribute to global warming.

    Carbon dioxide (CO2) is the leading greenhouse gas, so called
    because it accumulates in the atmosphere, traps solar energy and
    leads to global warming

    Both reports challenge the assumption that carbon storage in
    trees will yield environmental benefits. "The economics of the
    developing carbon sequestration market is becoming an additional
    driver for clearing native forests," concludes the Greenpeace/WWF
    report "The Clearcut Case: How the Kyoto Protocol Could Become a
    Driver for Deforestation."

    Certain countries are known to be pushing for forests to be used
    as carbon stores rather than reducing emissions of the greenhouse
    gases that cause global warming. The issue is expected to be one
    of the most controversial topics at talks to accelerate emissions
    cuts under the Kyoto Protocol in The Hague, Netherlands next
    week.

    The Kyoto Protocol is an addition to the United Nations Framework
    Convention on Climate Change governing the emissions of six
    greenhouse gases from 39 industrialized countries. These
    countries have committed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by an
    average of 5.2 percent below 1990 levels by 2008-2012.

    But the treaty must be ratified for these commitments to take
    effect. The Sixth Conference of the Parties to the convention in
    The Hague, from November 13 to 24, is seen by many as the last
    chance for this to happen.

    The United States, Japan, Australia and Canada are promoting the
    idea of forest carbon storage as part of their strategies to
    lower emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases. Greenpeace and
    other environmental groups claim the policy waters down
    commitments made in Kyoto in 1997.

    Canada, Australia and the U.S. are all struggling to cut
    emissions. Canada has committed to cut greenhouse gas emissions
    by six percent below 1990 levels by 2008-2012, but saw emissions
    actually rise by 13 percent between 1990 and 1998. The U.S. saw
    its emissions rise 11.5 percent for the same period and Australia
    16 percent.

    The Greenpeace/WWF report examines several Australian projects as
    case studies of what could emerge as "a dangerous new
    international threat to forests and the species they support."

    The report implicates Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO),
    Japan's largest power utility, in the destruction of native
    forest in the Tamar Valley in the Australian state of Tasmania.
    The forest was replaced by fast growing eucalyptus plantations
    intended for carbon credits under the Kyoto Protocol, says the
    report.

    TEPCO's investment of A$10 million (US$5 million) in Tamar Tree
    Farms accounts for 3,000 hectares of eucalyptus plantation which
    are expected to yield TEPCO 130,000 tonnes of carbon credits that
    could be offset against rising carbon emissions in Japan, the
    report continues.

    The report claims the project is not an isolated incident, but
    compatible with the forest clearance program of Australian and
    Tasmanian authorities.

    "Claiming credit for carbon stored in trees is a blatant attempt
    by some countries to cheat on their Kyoto commitments," said Bill
    Hare, Greenpeace's climate policy director. "This report shows
    that it is also bad for the environment, leading in some cases to
    the destruction of old growth forest to make way for 'carbon
    sink' plantations."

    "The only way to combat climate change is through deep cuts in
    emissions of global warming gases," said Jennifer Morgan,
    director of WWF's Climate Change Campaign. "The Tasmania project
    is an example of what could go terribly wrong for forests around
    the world if Japan, Australia, Canada and the United States get
    their way.

    "We could see native forest destruction accelerate but still see
    no benefit for the global climate. This is potentially the
    largest of a number of loopholes in the Kyoto climate treaty that
    governments urgently need to close."

    Greenpeace and WWF are calling on the 184 parties to the Climate
    Convention to exclude carbon sinks from the Kyoto Protocol, and
    from its Clean Development Mechanism. The Clean Development
    Mechanism would allow industrialized countries to claim credit
    for emissions reduction projects in developing countries.

    In a research paper published in this week's edition of Nature,
    Hadley Centre scientists argue that simply planting forests may
    be less effective in slowing global warming than previously
    expected.

    These are the conclusions of scientists studying the effects of
    vegetation, soils and oceans on climate change.

    Working with Southampton Oceanography Centre, the researchers
    describe the world's first computer model of climate which
    includes the effect of climate induced changes in vegetation and
    the carbon cycle.

    Using this model, the team led by Dr. Peter Cox predicts that
    global warming is likely to cause the world's soils to emit more
    carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, leading to further warming of
    the climate.

    They found that climate change could threaten the viability of
    the Amazonian rain forest, which would also release carbon
    dioxide and contribute to faster global warming. The model
    predicts a rise in average global land temperatures of 6°C (or
    11°F) from 2000 to 2100, which is 2.0°C (or 4°F) higher than
    predictions made before these effects were included.

    "Our initial results suggest that vegetation and soils, which
    currently absorb about a quarter of human made carbon dioxide
    emissions, could accelerate future climate change by releasing
    carbon to the atmosphere as the planet warms," said Dr. Cox.
    "This potentially large climate feedback needs to be investigated
    further."

    A second research paper shows that planting new forests will not
    slow global warming as much as expected. The Kyoto Protocol
    allows countries to plant forests in order to offset some of
    their CO2 emissions from burning fossil fuels. But forests are
    generally darker than the underlying terrain, and hence absorb
    more of the sun's heat.

    "This is particularly true in snowy conditions when grass and
    soil are covered by snow but trees remain exposed," said the
    paper. The extra absorption of sunlight causes the world's
    northern forests to have a warming effect, which would offset
    part of the cooling effect of CO2 uptake.

    In some areas of Canada and Siberia, the paper suggests this
    warming effect is actually greater than the relative cooling
    afforded by CO2 uptake. Planting forests in these areas would
    therefore increase warming rather than decrease it as intended.

    "Natural forests are key for maintaining biodiversity and
    rainfall patterns, but in colder regions, growing new forests may
    not be as useful as expected for reducing climate warming," said
    the author Dr. Richard Betts. "In some areas it could even be
    counterproductive."

    Reacting to the Hadley Centre's reports, UK Environment Minister
    Michael Meacher said real emissions reductions are the way to
    meet Kyoto targets. On sinks, he added, "We must be cautious
    about them."

    "The storms and floods being experienced across the UK are a
    wakeup call to the serious environmental threat posed by climate
    change, and increasingly expert research is bringing the message
    home even more."

    Environment News Service (ENS)

    ****************************************************************
    To post a submission by email at climate-newswire@sidsnet.org
    To unsubscribe, email to majordomo@sidsnet.org with the message:
    unsubscribe climate-newswire
    To receive updates via email, send an email to majordomo@sidsnet.org with the message:
    subscribe climate-newswire
    No SUBJECTS required either case.

    Brought to you on the SMALL Island Developing States Network: http://www.sidsnet.org



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Nov 10 2000 - 18:05:33 EST